best configuration for varnish and multiple IPs and vhosts?
Chris Hecker
checker at d6.com
Tue Jun 22 08:45:30 CEST 2010
Cool, thanks. Is there any issue with getting good logs per-site?
Chris
Martin Boer wrote:
> We've been using option nr.1 for over half a year now.
> It works fine.
>
> The reason we do it this way is that for all of our HTTP sites we have a
> HTTPS one as well.
> Pound handles the HTTPS sites of things and Varnish does the HTTP part.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
>
> Caunter, Stefan wrote:
>>
>> One varnish on one IP, that knows about all of the apache vhosts. You
>> can run apache on 127.0.0.1 if you like. Varnish must answer
>> externally for these websites.
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Sent using BlackBerry
>> 416 561 4871
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org
>> <varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org>
>> To: varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org <varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org>
>> Sent: Mon Jun 21 19:34:28 2010
>> Subject: best configuration for varnish and multiple IPs and vhosts?
>>
>>
>> I searched around for an answer to this, but wasn't able to find
>> anything comprehensive, so I'll ask here. I'm a total newbie at this
>> stuff, so please let me know if I missed some obvious link.
>>
>> I have a single webserver with 5 IP addresses. Each IP has at least one
>> apache-based site on it, and sometimes there are multiple on a single IP
>> via NameVirtualHost. None of the sites share any content.
>>
>> What is the best varnish setup for this? It seems there are multiple
>> options:
>>
>> 1. Have a single varnishd listen on all the IPs and run them all
>> through a single apache port with name virtual hosts, so it's one big
>> cache?
>>
>> 2. Multiple varnish daemons, one per IP, apache listening on multiple
>> ports, one per IP for the back end?
>>
>> 3. Something else entirely?
>>
>> I don't have a ton of memory, if that matters. I need to use a cache
>> mostly to handle spikes from being reddited and whatnot, the normal
>> daily load is fine for the server.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list