Understand "hit for pass" cache objects
Rob S
rtshilston at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 23:52:01 CET 2010
Rob S wrote:
> Justin Pasher wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Herein lies my dilemma. A request for the same URL
>> (http://www.example.com/) is sometimes cacheable and sometimes not
>> cacheable (it usually depends on whether it's the first time a user
>> visits the site and the Set-Cookie header has to be sent). What this
>> means is if I have a very heavy hit URL as a landing page from Google,
>> most of the time there will be a "hit for pass" cache object in Varnish,
>> since most people going to that page will have a Set-Cookie header.
>>
>
> Justin,
>
> Rather than answer your question (which other people are answering), I'd
> suggest you reconsider using sessions and selectively caching full
> pages. There are several other solutions that might work for you - for
> example, including personalised content via ESI, or overlaying it
> client-side with javascript. We're using a combination of these to
> great effect - and ensure that any page containing a session cookie is
> never cached.
>
> Obviously the based
I meant "appropriate" - goodness knows what I was typing!
> answer would depend on the nature of your apps, but
> it might be worth looking at in the longer term. There's more than one
> way to crack an egg.
>
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list