obj.cacheable vs expires headers?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <15261481.301265709947078.JavaMail.luc at syntop>, lstroobant at gmail.com
 writes:

>I'm not sure we're still talking about the same problem. :-)
>Just to be sure: we don't want to cache that dynamic page, but I'm
>wondering why (with those) headers, it's still seen as obj.cacheable
>by Varnish.

As I said, the cacheability is a different decision from how long
time to cache.

The logic of the code is in the sourcefile "rfc2616.c", try to walk
your request through it by hand...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.