varnish-misc Digest, Vol 23, Issue 25

Fredrik Nygren fredrik.nygren at gotamedia.se
Fri Feb 29 13:48:43 CET 2008


Alright. Wonder then if somebody has any rpm's to share for Redhat EL4  
i386 with the patch included?

Regards
<fredrik />

On 29 feb 2008, at 12.25, Anders Vännman wrote:

I guess its the same problem that ive had, and there is a patch  
regarding
it;

http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ticket/197


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:23:21 +0100
> From: Fredrik Nygren <fredrik.nygren at gotamedia.se>
> Subject: Blank pages with HTTP/1.0
> To: varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> Cc: Stina Lange <stina.lange at teliasonera.com>, Fredrik Sj?dell
> 	<fredrik.sjodell at gmail.com>,	Petri Luomala <p3 at bt.se>, Peter  
> Granstr?m
> 	<peter.granstrom at teliasonera.com>
> Message-ID: <6C00C181-BCF6-4DE9-A525-658DD180CE39 at gotamedia.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi,
> I have a couple of servers with Varnish 1.1.2-5 installed. Some
> visitors has reported a blank page when they are visiting us. What I
> can se from our logs the problem seems to be related to the visitors
> HTTP protocol version. Requests with HTTP/1.0 gets a blank page but
> HTTP/1.1 not. Our Apache logs shows this:
>
> [28/Feb/2008:10:32:14 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145883 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR  
> 1.1.4322)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:39:53 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145863 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR  
> 1.1.4322)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:18 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145886 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:32 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:43 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:44 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:45 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:44:47 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:10:45:04 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:11:21:09 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 146633 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
> [28/Feb/2008:12:31:46 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 146205 "-"
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
>
> Responses with 17491 bytes in return are blank page views.
> From our varnishlog I read the following:
>
> 134 SessionOpen  c 134.25.0.133 14373
>  134 ReqStart     c 134.25.0.133 14373 2174456149
>  134 RxRequest    c GET
>  134 RxURL        c /
>  134 RxProtocol   c HTTP/1.0
>  134 RxHeader     c Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg,
> image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel,
> application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */*
>  134 RxHeader     c Accept-Language: sv
>  134 RxHeader     c UA-CPU: x86
>  134 RxHeader     c User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
>  134 RxHeader     c Host: www.smp.se
>  134 RxHeader     c Cookie:
> __utma=147067189.81457932.1204189951.1204189951.1204189951.1;
> __utmb=147067189; __utmz=147067189.1204189951.1.1.utmccn=(direct)|
> utmcsr=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); InsightXE022004=216172787026292393
>  134 RxHeader     c X-NovINet: v1.2
>  134 RxHeader     c Via: 1.0 portos.sr.se:8080 (squid/2.6.STABLE18)
>  134 RxHeader     c Cache-Control: max-age=259200
>  134 VCL_call     c recv lookup
>  134 VCL_call     c hash hash
>  134 HitPass      c 2174455371
>  134 VCL_call     c pass pass
>  134 Backend      c 123 smp
>  134 ObjProtocol  c HTTP/1.1
>  134 ObjStatus    c 200
>  134 ObjResponse  c OK
>  134 ObjHeader    c Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:22:29 GMT
>  134 ObjHeader    c Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
>  134 ObjHeader    c Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
>  134 ObjHeader    c Content-Language: sv-SE
>  134 ObjHeader    c Set-Cookie:
> JSESSIONID=4CF19E800052C32EC682743E8D6B8920.sehan9078gota8009; Path=/
>  134 TTL          c 2174456149 RFC 120 1204190549 1204190549 0 0 0
>  134 VCL_call     c fetch pass
>  134 Length       c 0
>  134 VCL_call     c deliver deliver
>  134 TxProtocol   c HTTP/1.1
>  134 TxStatus     c 200
>  134 TxResponse   c OK
>  134 TxHeader     c Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
>  134 TxHeader     c Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
>  134 TxHeader     c Content-Language: sv-SE
>  134 TxHeader     c Set-Cookie:
> JSESSIONID=4CF19E800052C32EC682743E8D6B8920.sehan9078gota8009; Path=/
>  134 TxHeader     c Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:22:29 GMT
>  134 TxHeader     c X-Varnish: 2174456149
>  134 TxHeader     c Age: 0
>  134 TxHeader     c Via: 1.1 varnish
>  134 TxHeader     c Connection: close
>  134 ReqEnd       c 2174456149 1204190549.767153978
> 1204190549.773138046 0.000030041 0.005959034 0.000025034
>
> I have searched the mailinglist and found this thread which seems to
> look like our problem but I'm not sure it's the same problem:
> http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-misc/2008-February/001349.html
>
> Is there a known problem with the HTTP/1.0 protocol and Varnish?
>
> Regards
> <fredrik />
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>
> End of varnish-misc Digest, Vol 23, Issue 25
> ********************************************


_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc




More information about the varnish-misc mailing list