cache empties itself?
Michael S. Fischer
michael at dynamine.net
Thu Apr 3 20:04:57 CEST 2008
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski at web.de> wrote:
> and I don't wan't upstream caches or browsers to cache that long, only
> varnish, so setting headers doesn't seem to fit.
Why not? Just curious. If it's truly cachable content, it seems as
though it would make sense (both for your performance and your
bandwidth outlays) to let browsers cache.
--Michael
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list