[experimental-ims] 37586e0 Use SMA instead in the hope that we can escape what I think is a page-size issue on ppc64
Geoff Simmons
geoff at varnish-cache.org
Wed Aug 31 16:04:43 CEST 2011
commit 37586e05ec8505a19e365d859f3594a7f49c0bbf
Author: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon Aug 29 07:24:49 2011 +0000
Use SMA instead in the hope that we can escape what I think is a
page-size issue on ppc64
diff --git a/bin/varnishtest/tests/g00002.vtc b/bin/varnishtest/tests/g00002.vtc
index 3f2f951..574f1f2 100644
--- a/bin/varnishtest/tests/g00002.vtc
+++ b/bin/varnishtest/tests/g00002.vtc
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ server s1 {
} -start
varnish v1 \
+ -storage "-smalloc,2m" \
-cliok "param.set http_gzip_support true" \
-cliok "param.set gzip_memlevel 1" \
-vcl+backend {
@@ -32,9 +33,7 @@ client c1 {
} -run
# If this fails, the multiple storage allocations did not happen
-varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 0
-varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 1
-varnish v1 -expect SMF.s0.c_req != 2
+varnish v1 -expect SMA.s0.c_req > 2
client c1 {
# See varnish can gunzip it.
More information about the varnish-commit
mailing list